JongYeob: GWN20030407번역/4. 커뮤니티 화제

GWN20030407번역/4. 커뮤니티 화제
« May 2012 »
	1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	31
타라 덩컨
사각팬티
TDMA
LeeJongHyeop
<?xml version='1.0' encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/xsl/guide.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE guide SYSTEM "/dtd/guide.dtd">
<guide type="newsletter">
<chapter>
<title>커뮤니티 화제</title>
<section>
	<title>Web Forums</title>
	<body>
	<p><b>Slithering Along the Bleeding Edge</b></p>

	<p>The development tree of the Linux kernel is advancing towards 2.6 rapidly, and several threads in the forums are making clear that Gentooists are pretty much following the development as closely as possible. Not without the occasional problem, apparently...</p>
	<p><ul>
	<li><uri link="http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=44859">development kernel 2.5.66 what works / doesn't work for you?</uri></li>
	<li><uri link="http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=45637">Patches for mm-sources 2.5.66r3</uri></li>
	</ul>
	</p>
	<p><b>Best April Fool's Joke Ever</b></p>

	<p>Check the first link in our list: The forums had actually predicted that this would happen... But the threat of Portage's disappearance hit a nerve in many faithful Gentoo users, and many went into shock for anything between a split-second to several hours. They shouted abuse at their screens or room mates, and threatened to start deleting their portage tree before it dawned on them: They'd been had... And amidst the outrage over Gentoo's alleged move to RPM, only a handful of Germans found the second false news in last week's GWN.</p>
	<p><ul>
	<li><uri link="http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=44880">No GWN today?</uri></li>
	<li><uri link="http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=44980">Portage 2.1 moving to RPM</uri></li>
	<li><uri link="http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=45028">emerge -> rpm?</uri> (German)</li>
	<li><uri link="http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=45646">Portage 2.1 e lsb</uri> (Italian)</li>
	<li><uri link="http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=45039">Gentoo basé sur les rpm ???</uri> (French)</li>
	</ul>
	</p>
	</body>
	</section>
	<section>
     <title>gentoo-user</title>
     <body>
       <p><b>Gentoo Corporate Usage?</b></p>
       <p>
	   With over 60 responses so far, this week's busiest thread on gentoo-user asks about companies (preferably large ones) that are using Gentoo in a production environment.  Many people responded indicating they didn't feel Gentoo was appropriate for a production environment, noting too many problems with their own personal systems.  Others indicated that Gentoo ran quite happily in a production role, often serving upwards of 150,000 clients.  The responses are obviously quite varied and, in many cases, off-topic, but the thread does contain quite a few interesting insights into the trials and tribulations of using Gentoo Linux in a production environment.
		</p>
		<ul>
		<li><uri link="http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=104930176600004&r=3&w=2">Survey: Gentoo Corporate Usage?</uri></li>
		</ul>
		<p><b>Package management for non-ebuild software</b></p>
		<p>
		Jan Drugowitsch asked about managing software packages installed outside of Portage on a Gentoo Linux system.  Responses were varied and helpful, pointing to several open source projects which might fit the bill.
		</p>
		<ul>
			<li><uri link="http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-user&w=2&r=1&s=package+management+for+non-ebuild&q=b">Package management for non-ebuild software</uri></li>
		</ul>
	</body>
	</section>
<section>
  <title>gentoo-dev</title>
  <body>
  <p><b>Portage Programming Question</b></p>
  <p>Robin H. Johnson
     <uri link="http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-dev&m=104900613027231&w=2">asked</uri>
	 about the availability of some documentation on the Portage DB API and he received a nice surprise
	 when he was told to type <c>python</c> [RETURN] <c>help()</c> [RETURN] <c>portage</c> to get to
	 Python's interactive help.
  </p>

  <p><b>ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~arch" equivalent?</b></p>
  <p>Jani Monoses was
     <uri link="http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-dev&m=104877565711737&w=2">wondering</uri>
	 if there is a more simple solution to the use of the long <c>ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~arch" emerge package_name</c>.
	 Thomas M. Beaudry
	 <uri link="http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-dev&m=104877651312869&w=2">chipped in</uri>
	 with the suggestion to use Bash aliases (see <c>man bash</c>). And another Thomas
	 <uri link="http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-dev&m=104877594312098&w=2">contributed</uri>
	 with his alias definition <c>alias expmerge='ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge'</c>.
  </p>
  </body>
</section>
</chapter>
</guide>
ID
Password
Join